Freedom Over Everything

If giving up nearly HALF of your Constitutional protections by Collins and Perdue, is acceptable to you, I will not stand in your way. I feel that you need to understand what you're voting for. Are you sure you want your liberties eroded by 40% every year.

Read more

The Circle of Loot

If you understand how Mainstream Media (including FOX) controls the masses and their voting, then you will understand why they hate President Trump's Tweets.

President Trump goes around the media and directly to the people, Unfiltered. So will we and that is how we will overcome the Establishment.

Donate Today!


Pro Life and Pro Choice

Abortion: I am Pro Life AND Pro Choice

I may as well deal with this issue now. I believe in the sanctity of ALL Human Life (I'm not a vegetarian). For me, and science, life begins at conception. Albeit only a clump of cells, engaged in the process of division, it has begun a path of growth with the end result being that of the birth of a Human Baby. In short, that is where life starts and it ends in the physical realm at death. The hope in ALL life is that the end is of Natural Causes.

Pro Life -

Over the years, it is sad to say that abortion has morphed into more than just a means of ending the process of birth, of life, to an extraordinary method of birth control. One that I assure you, was never intended when those Justices voted to uphold Roe v Wade. I won't bore you with the many statistics on how Blacks and minority communities are impacted more negatively by this practice than Whites. Suffice it to say, it's a damned shame that we've reached a point to where in order to dehumanize the process of Life, many refer to that life in it's initial stages as a zygote or a clump of cells.

Pro Choice -

The Declaration of Independence states, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." Notice the word "Life". It is first for a reason. Without Life, there is nothing. No Liberty and certainly no Pursuit of Happiness. One must have Life and that life begins at conception.

You are probably asking, "Well Minister Grayson, where is my choice to do with "My Body", as I choose." You say, "choose". Let me suggest and count your choices and they speak directly to my being Pro Choice.

1. The Government has no Right interfering with "Your Choice" to have sex with whomever you "Choose" as "Consenting Adults", male or female.

2. You can choose to engage in Protected or UnProtected Sex. That's your Right, it's your Choice. It includes various forms of Birth Control, readily available and most for free. We even have the "Morning After Pill", once known as RU486. A couple of side notes. Wait staff often use the phrase, "Joe, 86 the cheese" and the US Navy was using the Morning After Pill as early as 1981.

3. If you wake up the next morning, you can "Choose" up to 72 hours (Some say 48, others 1-5 days). However, it will NOT abort a fetus or harm a baby if conception has already taken place and there is no limit to how many times you can take. It's a choice.

4. We meet people all the time. A little effort in knowing who we are going to sleep with is a choice. Women, if he has 5 kids by 7 women already, run. Men, if she has 6 kids by 9 men, move to another city. Just a little effort is all it takes. Choice. I think you get my point.

In short, you have at least 5 chances to do the right thing, choose wisely. How many do you need in order for the next life to be considered as valuable as yours? Bottom line, your choice stops when another life begins.

It's not your body (or clump of cells) being violently ripped from the womb.

No Choice, No Life -

I know many are concerned about Rape, Incest and even those who may have some cognitive limitations. I understand that and I am sympathetic to it. However, if I may use my own daughter to make a point. If my daughter were the victim of such a circumstance, I would be there for her every step of the way, ensuring her that while her circumstance is tragic, it doesn't justify the taking of another innocent life. In the event she is unable or unwilling to raise that child, Adoption is the best possible outcome for every life involved.

Some will say, "I don't have a father, mother or any form of a support system that I can turn to." I submit that there are as many as there are organizations that promote abortion as there are those who don't. Lastly, babies are hard to adopt simply because there aren't that many available. People adopt babies, plain and simple.

Pro Choice, Pro Life -

As a Senator, I vow to fight to prevent ANY taxpayer funding of Abortion at the Federal Level. States can decide for themselves. If Abortion remains legal, let charity pay for it, not taxpayers.

Minister Derrick E. Grayson
Senatorial Candidate

Volunteer, Donate, Pass The Word

The Second

Commander In Chief

There is no better Commander-In-Chief in modern times than President Donald Trump.


I was asked, therefore I may as well share it with you. This is my personal and political view on marriage....



I'm for marriage. However, I'm Christian and I follow marriage as prescribed by the Bible.
Government has no business in marriage. That include the SCOTUS.

States should abandon the license requirement.
Marriage is a civil issue, a private contract and should be addressed as such.
Christian churches, if they desire not to, should not be forced to perform gay weddings.

Personally, I ascribe to the Judeo/Christian definition of marriage, a union between a man and a woman.
All others I view as civil unions and therefore I will not redefine what "marriage" was meant to be.
Civil unions are also not the business of the government, provided they are between consenting adults.

Let us also not forget our history. The marriage license was a construct to prevent Whites and Negroes from marrying.
Today, it is just another money making government intrusion.

I hope this answers your questions.

Kind regards,



Human Trafficking

Why is Human Trafficking in America a thing, AGAIN?

I expressed before that based on my studies, we are once again living in a time of GREAT moral depravity, IN THIS COUNTRY. It may as well be Ancient Rome...

I won't speak on China or certain Middle Eastern Countries, but I will speak on this one....

1. We legalized the killing of our babies.
2. We took God out of our schools, thus eliminating a moral compass for many.
3. We put the Federal Government in charge of Education.
4. We kill innocent men or wrongly convict and incarcerate them for decades.
5. We've allowed perverts in Hollywood to molest our kids for a buck, indoctrinate and normalized sexual deviancy to our nation, specifically targeting our children.
6. Our news is no longer news, but once again yellow journalism.
7. As a result, too many in our nation are quite plainly idiots being led to their own slaughter.

Why? Liberal Democrats and RINOs (Democrats in the GOP).

As the Bible says.....

Ecclesiastes 1:9

9 What has been will be again,
what has been done will be done again;
there is nothing new under the sun.



The Central Bank

The Birth of Legal Counterfeiting

The FED is a central bank.

Central banks are supposed to implement a country's monetary policies. They monitor commercial banks to ensure that they maintain sufficient assets, like cash, so as to remain solvent and stable.

Central banks also do business, such as currency exchanges and gold transactions, with other central banks.

In theory, a central bank should be good for a country, and they might be if it wasn't for the fact that they are not owned or controlled by the government of the country they are serving. Private central banks, including our FED, operate not in the interest of the public good but for profit.

There have been three central banks in our nation's history. The first two, while deceptive and fraudulent, pale in comparison to the scope and size of the fraud being perpetrated by our current FED. What they all have in common is an insidious practice known as "fractional banking."

Fractional banking or fractional lending is the ability to create money from nothing, lend it to the government or someone else and charge interest to boot. The practice evolved before banks existed.

Goldsmiths rented out space in their vaults to individuals and merchants for storage of their gold or silver. The goldsmiths gave these "depositors" a certificate that showed the amount of gold stored. These certificates were then used to conduct business.

In time the goldsmiths noticed that the gold in their vaults was rarely withdrawn. Small amounts would move in and out but the large majority never moved.

Sensing a profit opportunity, the goldsmiths issued double receipts for the gold, in effect creating money (certificates) from nothing and then lending those certificates (creating debt) to depositors and charging them interest as well.

Since the certificates represented more gold than actually existed, the certificates were "fractionally" backed by gold. Eventually some of these vault operations were transformed into banks and the practice of fractional banking continued.

Keep that fractional banking concept in mind as we examine our first central bank, the First Bank of the United States (BUS).

It was created, after bitter dissent in the Congress, in 1791 and chartered for 20 years. A scam not unlike the current FED, the BUS used its control of the currency to defraud the public and establish a legal form of usury.

This bank practiced fractional lending at a 10:1 rate, ten dollars of loans for each dollar they had on deposit.

This misuse and abuse of their public charter continued for the entire 20 years of their existence. Public outrage over these abuses was such that the charter was not renewed and the bank ceased to exist in 1811.

The war of 1812 left the country in economic chaos, seen by bankers as another opportunity for easy profits. They influenced Congress to charter the second central bank, the Second Bank of the United States (SBUS), in 1816.

The SBUS was more expansive than the BUS. The SBUS sold franchises and literally doubled the number of banks in a short period of time.

The country began to boom and move westward, which required money. Using fractional lending at the 10:1 rate, the central bank and their franchisees created the debt/money for the expansion.

Things boomed for a while, then the banks decided to shut off the debt/money, citing the need to control inflation. This action on the part of the SBUS caused bankruptcies and foreclosures. The banks then took control of the assets that were used as security against the loans.

Closely examine how the SBUS engineered this cycle of prosperity and depression. The central bank caused inflation by creating debt/money for loans and credit and making these funds readily available.

The economy boomed. Then they used the inflation which they created as an excuse to shut off the loans/ credit/ money.

The resulting shortage of cash caused the economy to falter or slow dramatically and large numbers of business and personal bankruptcies resulted. The central bank then seized the assets used as security for the loans.

The wealth created by the borrowers during the boom was then transferred to the central bank during the bust. And you always wondered how the big guys ended up with all the marbles.

Now, who do you think is responsible for all of the ups and downs in our economy over the last 85 years?

Think about the depression of the late '20s and all through the '30s. The FED could have pumped lots of debt/money into the market to stimulate the economy and get the country back on track, but did they?

No; in fact, they restricted the money supply quite severely. We all know the results that occurred from that action, don't we?

Why would the FED do this? During that period asset values and stocks were at rock bottom prices. Who do you think was buying everything at 10 cents on the dollar?

I believe that it is referred to as consolidating the wealth. How many times have they already done this in the last 85 years?

Do you think they will do it again?

Just as an aside at this point, look at today's economy. Markets are declining. Why? Because the FED has been very liberal with its debt/ credit/ money.

The market was hyper inflated. Who creates inflation? The FED. How does the FED deal with inflation? They restrict the debt/ credit/ money.

What happens when they do that? The market collapses.

Several months back, after certain central banks said they would be selling large quantities of gold, the price of gold fell to a 25-year low of about $260 per ounce. The central banks then bought gold.

After buying at the bottom, a group of 15 central banks announced that they would be restricting the amount of gold released into the market for the next five years. The price of gold went up $75.00 per ounce in just a few days.

How many hundreds of billions of dollars did the central banks make with those two press releases?

Gold is generally considered to be a hedge against more severe economic conditions. Do you think that the private banking families that own the FED are buying or selling equities at this time? (Remember: buy low, sell high.)

How much money do you think these FED owners have made since they restricted the money supply at the top of this last current cycle?

Alan Greenspan has said publicly on several occasions that he thinks the market is overvalued, or words to that effect.

Just a hint that he will raise interest rates (restrict the money supply), and equity markets have a negative reaction. Governments and politicians do not rule central banks, central banks rule governments and politicians.

President Andrew Jackson won the presidency in 1828 with the promise to end the national debt and eliminate the SBUS.

During his second term President Jackson withdrew all government funds from the bank and on January 8, 1835, paid off the national debt. He is the only president in history to have this distinction. The charter of the SBUS expired in 1836.

Without a central bank to manipulate the supply of money, the United States experienced unprecedented growth for 60 or 70 years, and the resulting wealth was too much for bankers to endure. They had to get back into the game.

So, in 1910 Senator Nelson Aldrich, then Chairman of the National Monetary Commission, in collusion with representatives of the European central banks, devised a plan to pressure and deceive Congress into enacting legislation that would covertly establish a private central bank.

This bank would assume control over the American economy by controlling the issuance of its money.

After a huge public relations campaign, engineered by the foreign central banks, the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was slipped through Congress during the Christmas recess, with many members of the Congress absent.

President Woodrow Wilson, pressured by his political and financial backers, signed it on December 23, 1913.